Skip to main content

mod_erlang_event

Subpages (click to expand)


0. Status

Historical note (click to expand)

This note has been created by John Boteler on 2014.04.10, and haven't been changed since. Although there was no major update in the source in at least 7 years, so this may still be accurate.

Maturing, I'll try to provide backwards compatibility for 2 FreeSWITCH releases if I have to make an API change.

TODO

  • Ability to have multiple event handler pids per node, each with their own event subscriptions?

  • Figure out how to handle premature exits of spawned outbound processes

  • Allow log/event handler and handle call processes to be registered processes or pids

  • Check pids obtained via 'get_pid' to determine the node they're on in case they're not the node we requested a pid from (load balancing)

  • Investigate supporting starting a gen_server/gen_fsm using proc_lib:spawn/4 and enter_loop

  • Make datastructures more proplist friendly

1. About

mod_erlang_event is a derivative of mod_event_socket that sends events and receives commands in Erlang's binary term format. This allows FreeSWITCH™ to behave like just another Erlang node (albeit a hidden one). It uses the ei library to handle encoding/decoding the Erlang binary format, and the ei_connect functions to handle the network connections.

About Erlang

Erlang is a general-purpose, concurrent, functional programming language, and a garbage-collected run-time system. It supports hot swapping, so that code can be changed without stopping a system.

This module, just as mod_event_socket, operates in two modes, inbound and outbound.

ESL modes of operation

See mod_event_socket for a more detailed description on inbound and outbound modes.

2. Installation

2.1. Vanilla FreeSWITCH installation

If FreeSWITCH has been installed from pre-built binaries (see Installation), all documented modules come pre-compiled with it, along with their sample configuration files in the <conf_dir>/autoload_configs/ directory.

2.2. Compiling from source

You need Erlang (and its development headers) installed to compile this module. You must have Erlang development files installed before running the FreeSWITCH ./configure (or rerun ./configure after having Erlang installed). The FreeSWITCH™ configure script now checks for the Erlang requirements, and configures the Makefile appropriately.

To install Erlang, please go to https://www.erlang.org/downloads. All source files can be downloaded there, and each release has instructions for popular platforms and package managers.

Historical notes (click to expand)

Contents below may be out of date

The sections below are probably outdated. At least, the "Windows" section talks about Erlang R13, which came out in 2009.

Windows

As of SVN r13766, the module is known to work on windows (but it's not terribly well tested). Unfortunately the ei.lib that ships with windows releases of erlang isn't suitable for being used inside a DLL due to issues with thread local storage. The work around for this is to build it yourself following the README.win32 instructions included with the erlang source distribution and after you've run configure edit the eidefs.mk and remove -DUSE_DECLSPEC_THREAD from the THR_DEFS variable. Then you can just run `make release` in the libs/erl_interface directory and then edit mod_erlang_event's project options to point at the erl_interface/obj/win32/ei.lib for its linker flags. You'll probably also have to fix the include path in the compiler flags, too.

To add the erlang module to the freeswitch solution, right click on the solution and choose Add->Existing Project and browse to its .vcproj file. Once it's added edit the solution's properties, go to dependencies and for the module, make it depend on the freeswitch core lib.

ei binaries for compiling the module against R13B01 can be found here. The release libs are in obj/win32 and the debug ones are in obj.debug/win32.

OSX

If after compiling the module, loading it in FreeSWITCH gives you an error like

Error Loading module /usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_erlang_event.so
**dlopen(/usr/local/freeswitch/mod/mod_erlang_event.so, 6): Symbol not found: ___erl_errno_place

make sure you've built both Erlang AND FreeSWITCH with the same architecture. Erlang defaults to building 32 bit (even on a 64 bit kernel for some reason) and FreeSWITCH seems to default to 64 bit. The easiest solution is to rebuild erlang with the --enable-darwin-64bit argument to configure. Note, however, that 'make clean' doesn't work right for Erlang and its best to have a fresh source tree if recompiling to a new architecture.

3. Configuration

Step 1. Load mod_erlang_event in FreeSWITCH

First, make sure that <conf_dir>/autoload_configs/modules.conf.xml has the line <load module="mod_erlang_event"/> present, and is not commented out:

<conf_dir>/autoload_configs/modules.conf.xml

<configuration name="modules.conf" description="Modules">
<modules>
<!-- ... other modules ... -->
<load module="mod_erlang_event"/>
<!-- ... other modules ... -->
</modules>
</configuration>

Step 2. Edit <conf_dir>/autoload_configs/[erlang_event.conf.xml](https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/master/conf/vanilla/autoload%5Fconfigs/erlang%5Fevent.conf.xml)

mod_erlang_event's configuration file (<conf_dir>/autoload_configs/[erlang_event.conf.xml](https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/master/conf/vanilla/autoload%5Fconfigs/erlang%5Fevent.conf.xml)) is very similar to the one for mod_event_socket, but some parameters are different. See Configuration Parameters below.

<conf_dir>/autoload_configs/erlang_event.conf.xml Expand source

<configuration name="erlang_event.conf" description="Erlang Socket Client">
<settings>
<param name="listen-ip" value="0.0.0.0"/>
<param name="listen-port" value="8031"/>
<!-- Specify the first part of the node name
(the host part after the @ will be autodetected)
OR pass a complete nodename to avoid autodetection
eg. freeswitch@example or freeswitch@example.com.
If you pass a complete node name, the 'shortname' parameter has no effect. -->
<param name="nodename" value="freeswitch"/>
<!-- Specify this OR 'cookie-file' or $HOME/.erlang.cookie will be read -->
<param name="cookie" value="ClueCon"/>
<!-- Read a cookie from an arbitary erlang cookie file instead -->
<!--<param name="cookie-file" value="/$${temp_dir}/erlang.cookie"/>-->
<param name="shortname" value="true"/>
<!-- in additon to cookie, optionally restrict by ACL -->
<!--<param name="apply-inbound-acl" value="lan"/>-->
<!-- alternative is "binary" -->
<!--<param name="encoding" value="string"/>-->
<!-- provide compatability with previous OTP release (use with care) -->
<!--<param name="compat-rel" value="12"/> -->
</settings>
</configuration>

Step 3. Restart FreeSWITCH

Use sudo service freeswitch restart where systemd is used (reloadxml won't be enough).

4. Configuration parameters

The configuration parameters from mod_erlang_event.c:1232:

Configuration parameterDescriptionAccepted valuesExample
listen-ipSpecify the IP address of the server where the Erlang application is located.IP address<param name="listen-ip" value="0.0.0.0"/>
listen-portSpecify the TCP port to listen on.By default, mod_erlang_event listens on a different port (8031) than mod_event_socket (8021).TCP port number<param name="listen-port" value="8031"/>
cookieInstead of a password in mod_event_socket, mod_erlang_event uses a cookie.See Erlang Reference Manual, Distributed Erlang chapter, 13.7 Security section for more on cookies.String<param name="cookie" value="ClueCon"/>
cookie-fileTODO Never documented, see source.TODO File path?<param name="cookie-file" value="?"/>
nodenameSet the name of the FreeSWITCH C node.String<param name="nodename" value="freeswitch"/>
shortnameWhether to use the short name format for the FreeSWITCH C node.Erlang nodes with a short name can only talk to other nodes with a short name, and the same thing applies for nodes with long names.See 4.1 Short name vs. long name section below.Boolean<param name="shortname" value="true"/>
encodingThe encoding parameter indicates if you would prefer events to be encoded as Erlang binaries or as Erlang strings. Binaries tend to be faster and consume less memory, but strings can be easier to work with.[ string | binary ]<param name="encoding" value="binary"/>
compat-relFrom the vanilla erlang_event.conf.xml: "provide compatibility with previous OTP release (use with care)".Integer<param name="compat-rel" value="12"/>
apply-inbound-aclJust as with mod_event_socket, provide additional restrictions via Access Control List (ACL)s besides the cookie .valid ACL name<param name="apply-inbound-acl" value="lan"/>
max-event-bulkTODO Never documented, see source.
max-log-bulkTODO Never documented, see source.
stop-on-bind-errorTODO Never documented, see source.

4.1 Short name vs. long name

From the Erlang Reference Manual, Distributed Erlang chapter, 13.2 Nodes section (with minor edits):

A node is an executing Erlang runtime system that has been given a name, using the command-line flag -name (long names) or -sname (short names).

The format of the node name is an atom name@host .

  • name is the name given by the user.
  • host is the full host name if long names are used (i.e., FQDN), or the first part of the host name if short names are used (i.e., FQDN cropped to the first period).

node() returns the name of the node.

Example:

% erl -name dilbert (dilbert@uab.ericsson.se)1> node(). 'dilbert@uab.ericsson.se'

% erl -sname dilbert (dilbert@uab)1> node(). dilbert@uab

nodename is the name of the remote Erlang node across the network that would handle the FreeSWITCH events. If the shortname parameter is turned on (i.e., set to "true"), the local Erlang node will be named using the "short name" convention, described above.

So, for a module listening on the IP that resolves to "example.com" and the nodename set to "freeswitch",

  • with shortname enabled, the full nodename is 'freeswitch@example'
  • with shortname disabled, it will be 'freeswitch@example.com' instead.

4.1.1 How to set a custom name?

To force the nodename, specify the whole name (e.g., 'freeswitch@example.com') in the 'nodename' tag; mod_erlang_event will not try to guess what to call the node.

Erlang nodes with a short name can only talk to other nodes with a short name, and the same thing applies for nodes with long names.

5. Message formats

Erlang API

Accepted by the FreeSWITCH C node

This should be parsed to get all messages accepted by the FreeSWITCH C node:

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/66aa064588e66fed1aa7488ba8f363939b157e51/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/handle%5Fmsg.c#L1049

Supported command tuples based on the above link

{fetch_reply, ...}
{set_log_level, ...}
{event, ...}
{filter, ...}
{session_event, ...}
{nixevent, ...}
{session_nixevent, ...}
{api, ...}
{bgapi, ...}
{sendevent, ...}
{sendmsg, ...}
{bind, ...}
{handlecall, ...}
{rex, ...}
{setevent, ...}
{session_setevent, ...}

Emitted by the FreeSWITCH C node

{event, ... }

Created using ei_encode_switch_event (which is a C macro(?) calling ei_encode_switch_event_tag) and ei_encode_switch_event_header in mod_erlang_event.c.

Events are received in the form:

TODO Document this in 5. Message formats.

{event, [(UniqueID|'undefined'),
{EventHeaderKey, EventHeaderValue},
{EventHeaderKey2, EventHeaderValue2},
...]}

The event tuple consists of

  • the atom event,
  • followed by a variable length list of {Key, Value} tuples.

The list's first value is

  • either a call's UUID (represented above as UniqueID)
  • or the atom undefined if the event doesn't relate to a call.

The notion is to make it easier to pattern match for the purpose of the event, without traversing the entire list.

Rough list of other emitted tuples

These are only the ones whose creation is very straightforward (i.e., the ei_x_encode_tuple_header is followed by ei_x_encode_atom which roughly means {atom, ... }).

From mod_erlang_event.c:

{fetch, ...}
{call, ...}
{call_event, ...}
{call_hangup, ...}
{call_event, ...}
{log, ...}
{level, ...}
{text_channel, ...}
{file, ...}
{func, ...}
{line, ...}
{data, ...}
{user_data, ...}
{error, ...}
{freeswitch_sendmsg, ...}
{get_pid, ...}

QUESTION: mod_event_socket has execute to run dialplan applications, but didn't see that documented here, nor in the source. Does that mean mod_erlang_event does not support this?

Other source links from an old comment: (click to expand)

Couldn't see the received tuples documented anywhere, so looked it up in the `mod_erlang_event` source.

Links are relative to the latest commit on them to date.

{call, Data}

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent.c#L646

{call\_event, Data}

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent.c#L739

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent.c#L779

{get\_pid}

See the part also below when invoking `mod_erlang_event` with `myhandler:!`.

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent.c#L1548

Based on the examples, I'm also not sure what the syntax of `event` tuples should be, but the source to figure it out:

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/freeswitch.erl#L348

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/freeswitch.erl#L165

https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/718d2341f7327feea52c840648e42b33eb9c69dd/src/mod/event%5Fhandlers/mod%5Ferlang%5Fevent/freeswitch.erl#L26

TODO

Some messages only apply to outbound mode (e.g., get_pid ) so note these explicitly and direct readers to the relevant sections.

5.1. Accepted

5.2. Emitted

6. Inbound mode

The external Erlang application (running locally or remotely) controls the FreeSWITCH instance by sending messages to it (e.g., to check status, originate calls, register to receive events, execute applications).

An Erlang node needs to send register_event_handler as the very first step to register the current process as an event handler (regardless whether inbound and outbound), otherwise no events will be received from the FreeSWITCH C node.

6.1. Example

In these examples we're using the Erlang shell (erl) to communicate with FreeSWITCH™ using mod_erlang_event.

6.1.1. Example configuration

Let's assume FreeSWITCH is running, and that mod_erlang_event is using the vanilla configuration (see section 3. Configuration):

  • cookie set to 'ClueCon',
  • nodename set to 'freeswitch'
  • shortname enabled.

6.1.2. Start a distributed Erlang node locally with short names

"locally" meaning that the Erlang node is started on the same machine where the FreeSWITCH instance is already running.

The host name is 'example.com', so the short node name will be freeswitch@example.

TODO: What about remote Erlang nodes?

Click to expand ...

Update this section with info on how to achieve the same with remote nodes. My initial assumption was connecting remote nodes will only work with nodes with long names, but this seems to be wrong.

  1. Read up on it
  2. Add an example

Some resources:

$ erl -sname test -setcookie ClueCon
Erlang (BEAM) emulator version 5.6.4 [source] [async-threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]

To start an Erlang node with a long name, use the -name switch instead.

Don't forget to configure mod_erlang_event accordingly, and that Erlang nodes with short names cannot communicate with ones set up using long names, and vice versa. See Configuration and Configuration Parameters sections above.

The value provided to -setcookie is the same as the one used for the cookie parameter in the example mod_erlang_event configuration above.

6.1.3. Using Event Socket Library (ESL) commands

In the previous section we got the external Erlang node up and running locally, it's time to try it out.

All ESL commands can be used the same way from outbound mode as well. The only difference is that the FreeSWITCH instance will only "outsource" call processing to an Erlang node when a call matches an extension to an outbound socket in the dialplan.

6.1.3.1. api command

Event Socket Library's api command allows sending FreeSWITCH API commands to FreeSWITCH. We'll send the status command (note how the connection is negotiated automagically), and the FreeSWITCH C node will send the reply back to us asynchronously (all Erlang messages are asynchronous), so we have to explicitly receive it:

Eshell V5.6.4  (abort with ^G)

(test@example)1> {foo, freeswitch@example} ! {api, status, ""}.
{api,status,[]}

(test@example)2> receive X -> X after 1000 -> timeout end.
{ok,"Content-Type: text/html\n\nUP 0 years, 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, 35 seconds, 692 milliseconds, 193 microseconds\n0 session(s) since startup\n0 session(s) 0/30\n"}

To see whether there is anything sitting in the current process' mailbox, we specified a receive block with a 1000 millisecond timeout. The result shows that we indeed received status 's result; it would've just returned the atom timeout otherwise.

Why the {Name, Node } tuple when sending messages to the FreeSWITCH C node?

Paraphrasing the Erlang Reference Manual:

The general form of of the send operator (! ) is Expr1 ! Expr2. To send messages across distributed Erlang nodes, Expr1 needs to evaluate to a tuple {Name, Node} where Name is either an atom or a pid referencing a process on a remote node.

Why the value of Name in {Name, Node} can be arbitrary when sending messages to the FreeSWITCH C node?

Paraphrasing the Erlang Interoperability Tutorial section on C nodes:

From Erlang's point of view, the C node is treated like a normal Erlang node. Thus, calling the functions foo and bar only involves sending a message to the C node asking for the function to be called, and receiving the result. Sending a message requires a recipient, that is, a process that can be defined using either a pid or a tuple, consisting of a registered name and a node name. In this case, a tuple is the only alternative as no pid is known:

{RegName, Node} ! Msg

The node name Node is to be the name of the C node.

The registered name, RegName , can be any atom. The name can be

  • ignored by the C code, or,

  • for example, be used to distinguish between different types of messages.

Now, lets send an invalid command, and listen for the reply:

(test@example)3> {foo, freeswitch@example} ! {api, wtf, ""}, receive Y -> Y after 1000 -> timeout end.
{error,"wtf: Command not found!\n"}

So, as we can see, the command wtf isn't valid. Note that in both cases, a 2 element tuple is returned. Depending on the result of the command, the first element is either the atom ok or error.

Erlang variables are immutable

Note that we had to use a different variable name (i.e., Y ) this time to receive the results. If we used X again, Erlang would search the process' mailbox for an event that matched what X was bound to.

One could also do f(X). to forget the value of X in the shell. See the erl manual, or type help(). in erl . (The dots at the end of the commands are important.)

6.1.3.2. bgapi command

We'll now issue the status FreeSWITCH API commands in the background using bgapi:

(test@example)4> {foo, freeswitch@example} ! {bgapi, status, ""}, receive Z -> Z after 1000 -> timeout end.
{ok,"191d2b07-58ac-dd11-829b-000f1f68e553"}

Note that all we got was the Job-UUID of the background command.

There are two ways to get the results:

  1. Use a receive block one more time to read the direct reply from the process' mailbox:
(test@example)5> receive A -> A after 1000 -> timeout end.  
{bgok,"191d2b07-58ac-dd11-829b-000f1f68e553",
"Content-Type: text/html\n\nUP 0 years, 0 days, 1 hour, 11 minutes, 8 seconds, 654 milliseconds, 138
microseconds\n0 session(s) since startup\n0 session(s) 0/30\n"}

Note that the command's final result is tagged with bgok /bgerror. 2. In addition to a directed reply, a normal BACKGROUND_JOB event (see Event List) is also fired whenever a FreeSWITCH API command is executed in the background, which you could alternately choose to receive. (See events in the "API" section below on how to subscribe to FreeSWITCH system events).

api vs bgapi

A FreeSWITCH API commands called with bgapi

  • will be executed in its own thread,
  • is non-blocking, and
  • will only return a Job-UUID for future reference.

Once the command is finished executing, FreeSWITCH will fire a BACKGROUND_JOB event with the result, and the Job-UUID can be used to look up the result if multiple BACKGROUND_JOB events have been received. (Of course, one needs to subscribe to BACKGROUND_JOB events first.)

See Event Socket Library's "bgapi" section to see how to set custom a Job-UUID .

6.1.3.3. Working with events

(Work in progress)

7. Outbound mode

A dialplan extension can open a connection to an external application (running locally or on a remote host), and forward all generated system events to it whenever there is an incoming call matching the extension. If a scenario can be handled in an extension, then it can be processed by, and the workload offloaded to an external application.

In general,

  1. An incoming call traverses the dialplan,
  2. matches the extension that calls an outbound socket,
  3. the call gets parked, and
  4. system events relating to the call are then sent to specified Erlang node,
  5. where a process local to that node will continue handling the call.

An Erlang node needs to send register_event_handler as the very first step to register the current process as an event handler (regardless whether inbound and outbound), otherwise no events will be received from the FreeSWITCH C node.

7.1. Dialplan actions

7.1.1. Handle all incoming calls in one registered process

Syntax

<action application="erlang" data="REGISTERED_PROCESS LONG_OR_SHORT_NODENAME"/>

<!-- For example: -->
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler mynode@myserver"/>

The extension will send the call to the registered process named REGISTERED_PROCESS (e.g., myhandler) on the (remote or local) Erlang node LONG_OR_SHORT_NODENAME (e.g., mynode@myserver).

7.1.2. Return the PID of the process that will handle the call (via a registered process)

Syntax

<action application="erlang" data="REGISTERED_PROCESS:! LONG_OR_SHORT_NODENAME"/>

<!-- For example: -->
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:! mynode@server"/>

Instead of immediately sending all call events indiscriminately to the registered process to handle calls, FreeSWITCH will wait for a process ID (PID) to which all events for that call will be sent to.

The returned process ID could be that of

  • a newly spawned process, or
  • an already running process (e.g. a gen_server in the Erlang application already running on the external node).

For every incoming call to the extension, the registered process (e.g., myhandler) will receive messages in the form:

Callback syntax

{get_pid, UUID, Ref, Pid}

Where

  • UUID is the call's UUID,
  • Ref is a reference() created by the FreeSWITCH C node to uniquely identify the request, and
  • Pid is the ID of the process in the FreeSWITCH C node to send the response back to.

The expected response is of the form:

Callback syntax

{Ref, NewPid}

Where

  • Ref is the same as the Ref in the 4-tuple, returned as the first element of the tuple, and
  • pid() is the PID of the process that will handle the call.

7.1.3. Return the PID of the process that will handle the call (via RPC)

The notion is the same as in the previous section (i.e., FreeSWITCH will wait for a process ID (PID) to which all events for that call will be sent to), except no registered process is required. A remote procedure call (RPC) is fired to the external Erlang node instead.

TODO Add a mini glossary. E.g., using "external Erlang node" referring to the node that will handle the calls coming in to FreeSWITCH. Using the word "external" because (1) the actual node could be running locally (on the same machine as the FreeSWITCH instance) or remotely (on another machine), and (2) to emphasize that it is not the FreeSWITCH Erlang C node that is instantiated (~> choose a better word) when mod_erlang_event is configured. The C node will convert FreeSWITCH system events into Erlang terms (e.g., {call, _ } or {call_event, _ } ) among others.

Syntax

<action application="erlang" data="MODULE:FUNCTION LONG_OR_SHORT_NODENAME"/>

<!-- For example: -->
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:launch mynode@myserver"/>

Whenever a call comes in to this extension, the equivalent of rpc:call(LONG_OR_SHORT_NODENAME, MODULE, FUNCTION, [Ref]) is invoked by the FreeSWITCH C node

FUNCTION's has to have the type signature below

Callback syntax

-spec FUNCTION(Ref) -> {Ref, pid()}

where

  • Ref is a reference() that is simply returned as the first element of the tuple, and
  • pid() is the PID of the process that will handle the call.

The returned process ID could be that of

  • a newly spawned process, or
  • an already running process (e.g. a gen_server in the Erlang application already running on the external node).

7.2. Examples

See section 6. Inbound mode on how to set up a distributed Erlang node, and how to use the Event Socket Library commands.

TODO: Tidy up

Click here to expand...

7.2.1. Handle call events

-module(myhandler).

-export([start/0,run/0,launch/1]).

start()->
%% Start our handler process, and
Pid = spawn(?MODULE,run,[]),
%% Register it with the same name as the module (i.e., myhandler)
register(?MODULE,Pid).

run()->
%% Wait for messages from FreeSWITCH.
receive
%% A new call is starting, so handle it in this
%% registered process (in this case, print out the
%% calls UUID).
{call, Data}->
%% `_Rest` is a list of all the channel variables in
%% the form [{"<name>","<value"}].
%% (TODO: this should be documented at the "Erlang API" section below, with `call`, `call_event`, `event`, `get_pid`, and so on.)
{event, [UUID | _Rest]} = Data,
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: new call received, UUID is ~p~n",[self(), UUID]),
run();
%% Handling call events for already received calls.
{call_event, Data} ->
{event, [UUID | Rest]} = Data,
%% Find and print the name of the received event.
Name = proplists:get_value("Event-Name", Rest),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: UUID ~p, event ~p~n",[self(), UUID,Name]),
run();
%% FreeSWITCH request to handle the call in a new process. See Erlang API and (probably) Step 3 below.
{get_pid, UUID, Ref, Pid} ->
NewPid = spawn(?MODULE, run, []),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: request to spawn new handler process, returning ~p~n", [self(), NewPid]),
Pid ! {Ref, NewPid},
run()
end.

7.2.2. Distribute calls among Erlang processes

For example, process calls with different area codes (see Caller-ANI in Channel Variables) in separate Erlang processes that handle the specific area code.

This is the most general of the three strategies. It could be used to

recreate the two preceding sections (2.2.1.1 and 2.2.1.2)

utilize already running (and maybe registered) worker processes (i.e., juggle their PIDs around based on the task)

only start a specific worker when it is necessary, and then reuse its PID (if it isn't a one-off process that is)

?

Syntax

<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:! mynode@server"/>

myhandler:launch/1 with a single argument, a unique reference. The function is expected to return a tuple of the form {Ref, NewPid} where

NewPid should be a spawned process, a newly launched gen_server, etc.

Ref is the original reference passed in.

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/ext_123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<extension name="to_erlang">
<condition field="destination_number" expression="^123456$">
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler mynode@myserver"/>
</condition>
</extension>
</include>

The to_erlang extension will send calls for destination number 123456 to a registered process called myhandler on the (possibly remote) Erlang node mynode@myserver.

The myhandler process will handle all incoming calls to this extension sequentially (but this doesn't hinder anyone to spawn additional processes).

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<!-- ... -->
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:! mynode@server"/>
<!-- ... -->
</include>

If the string after the : is a '!', then mod_erlang_event knows you want to send a new process request to the registered process 'myhandler' which will return a pid that all events for that call will be sent to. The message the registered process receives is of the form:

{get_pid, UUID, Ref, Pid}

Where Ref is a unique reference used to identify this request, UUID is the call's UUID and Pid is the process to send the response to. The expected response is of the form:

{Ref, NewPid}

Where Ref is the original reference passed with get_pid and NewPid is the pid you'd like FreeSWITCH™ to send the events to.14877


The old new_pid message, which didn't include the call's UUID is deprecated in favor of get_pid as of SVN revision 14877 (09/15/09)


The module also supports true spawn/4 behaviour, but it turned out not to be so useful, so the rpc:call functionality above replaced it.

The myhandler example above supports all 3 outbound methods.

5.2.1.2 Spawn a process dynamically for each incoming call

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<extension name="to_erlang">
<condition field="destination_number" expression="^123456$">
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:launch mynode@myserver"/>
</condition>
</extension>
</include>

This will make a remote procedure call (RPC) to myhandler:launch/1 with a single argument, a unique reference. The function is expected to return a tuple of the form {Ref, NewPid} where

NewPid should be a spawned process, a newly launched gen_server, etc.

Ref is the original reference passed in.

myhandler.erl

-module(myhandler).

-export([start/0,run/0,launch/1]).

start()->
%% Start our handler process, and
Pid = spawn(?MODULE,run,[]),
%% Register it with the same name as the module (i.e., myhandler)
register(?MODULE,Pid).

run()->
%% Wait for messages from FreeSWITCH.
receive
%% A new call is starting, so handle it in this
%% registered process (in this case, print out the
%% calls UUID).
{call, Data}->
%% `_Rest` is a list of all the channel variables in
%% the form [{"<name>","<value"}].
%% (TODO: this should be documented at the "Erlang API" section below, with `call`, `call_event`, `event`, `get_pid`, and so on.)
{event, [UUID | _Rest]} = Data,
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: new call received, UUID is ~p~n",[self(), UUID]),
run();
%% Handling call events for already received calls.
{call_event, Data} ->
{event, [UUID | Rest]} = Data,
%% Find and print the name of the received event.
Name = proplists:get_value("Event-Name", Rest),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: UUID ~p, event ~p~n",[self(), UUID,Name]),
run();
%% FreeSWITCH request to handle the call in a new process. See Erlang API and (probably) Step 3 below.
{get_pid, UUID, Ref, Pid} ->
NewPid = spawn(?MODULE, run, []),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: request to spawn new handler process, returning ~p~n", [self(), NewPid]),
Pid ! {Ref, NewPid},
run()
end.

%% Sample function to demonstrate RPC
launch(Ref) ->
NewPid = spawn(?MODULE, run, []),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: launch request, returning ~p~n", [self(), NewPid]),
{Ref, NewPid}.

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/ext_123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<extension name="to_erlang">
<condition field="destination_number" expression="^123456$">
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler mynode@myserver"/>
</condition>
</extension>
</include>

Every incoming call will be handled in a newly spawned Erlang process, and the instructions handling the calls will be the same for all of them.

Example Outbound Connection

The gist is that an XML Dialplan extension will invoke the remote Erlang node to handle incoming traffic. Depending on the conditions set up with the extension, this traffic could be an incoming call to a range of destination numbers for example.

Step 1. Implement the Erlang code

Running an Erlang module as a distributed Erlang node, locally or remotely, will handle all traffic that gets directed from an extension in the FreeSWITCH dialplan.

The below module demonstrates mod_erlang_event's Erlang API, and the parts will be explained in later steps. Save it as myhandler.erl for example.

TODO cut this up into 3 pieces and include the relevant piece in each of the appropriate dialplan examples below. In the end show the full example, and dialplan. Or is there a better way?

myhandler.erl

-module(myhandler).

-export([start/0,run/0,launch/1]).

start()->
%% Start our handler process, and
Pid = spawn(?MODULE,run,[]),
%% Register it with the same name as the module (i.e., myhandler)
register(?MODULE,Pid).

run()->
%% Wait for messages from FreeSWITCH.
receive
%% A new call is starting, so handle it in this
%% registered process (in this case, print out the
%% calls UUID).
{call, Data}->
%% `_Rest` is a list of all the channel variables in
%% the form [{"<name>","<value"}].
%% (TODO: this should be documented at the "Erlang API" section below, with `call`, `call_event`, `event`, `get_pid`, and so on.)
{event, [UUID | _Rest]} = Data,
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: new call received, UUID is ~p~n",[self(), UUID]),
run();
%% Handling call events for already received calls.
{call_event, Data} ->
{event, [UUID | Rest]} = Data,
%% Find and print the name of the received event.
Name = proplists:get_value("Event-Name", Rest),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: UUID ~p, event ~p~n",[self(), UUID,Name]),
run();
%% FreeSWITCH request to handle the call in a new process. See Erlang API and (probably) Step 3 below.
{get_pid, UUID, Ref, Pid} ->
NewPid = spawn(?MODULE, run, []),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: request to spawn new handler process, returning ~p~n", [self(), NewPid]),
Pid ! {Ref, NewPid},
run()
end.

%% Sample function to demonstrate RPC
launch(Ref) ->
NewPid = spawn(?MODULE, run, []),
error_logger:info_msg("myhandler ~p: launch request, returning ~p~n", [self(), NewPid]),
{Ref, NewPid}.

Now compile it using erlc :

$ erlc myhandler.erl

Step 2. Start a distributed Erlang node and start handler process

The example below a node with a short name (which is also reflected in the erl shell's prompt), but you can always start one with a long name using the -name switch instead.

Don't forget to configure mod_erlang_event accordingly! Erlang node with short names cannot communicate with ones set up using long names, and vice versa. See Configuration and Configuration Parameters sections above.

$ erl -sname mynode -setcookie ClueCon
Erlang (BEAM) emulator version 5.5.5 [source] [async-threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]

Eshell V5.5.5 (abort with ^G)
(mynode@myserver)1>

start up the myhandler process in the mynode@myserver Erlang node:

Eshell V5.5.5  (abort with ^G)
(mynode@myserver)1> myhandler:start().
true

The -setcookie value is the same as the one used for the cookie parameter in <conf_dir>/autoload_configs/[erlang_event.conf.xml](https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/master/conf/vanilla/autoload%5Fconfigs/erlang%5Fevent.conf.xml).

Step 3. Add entry in dialplan to call the remote Erlang node

Use an already running registered process

Add an entry in your dialplan to redirect an inbound call to the Erlang application, by creating a new XML file for example:

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<extension name="to_erlang">
<condition field="destination_number" expression="^123456$">
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler mynode@myserver"/>
</condition>
</extension>
</include>

The example above refers to a node that is set up using a short name, but one can change this in the <conf_dir>/autoload_configs/[erlang_event.conf.xml](https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/blob/master/conf/vanilla/autoload%5Fconfigs/erlang%5Fevent.conf.xml) configuration file (see Configuration and Configuration Parameters sections above).

Don't forget to start the Erlang node accordingly! Erlang node with short names cannot communicate with ones set up using long names, and vice versa.

This will send calls for destination number 123456 to a registered process called myhandler on the (possibly remote) Erlang node mynode@myserver.

To test it,

Now dial extension 123456, and see what happens at the Erlang console:

 (mynode@myserver)2>
=INFO REPORT==== 23-Jan-2009::11:59:38 ===
myhandler: new call received, UUID is "4f77b818-e945-11dd-a442-9fe384e7e5a2"

=INFO REPORT==== 23-Jan-2009::11:59:39 ===
myhandler: UUID "4f77b818-e945-11dd-a442-9fe384e7e5a2", event "CHANNEL_PROGRESS"

=INFO REPORT==== 23-Jan-2009::11:59:39 ===
myhandler: UUID "4f77b818-e945-11dd-a442-9fe384e7e5a2", event "CHANNEL_PROGRESS_MEDIA"

=INFO REPORT==== 23-Jan-2009::11:59:39 ===
myhandler: UUID "4f77b818-e945-11dd-a442-9fe384e7e5a2", event "CHANNEL_PARK"

We've received all the events up to CHANNEL_PARK (see Event List for more). Now hang up the call, since we didn't add any code to answer it or do anything more interesting:

=INFO REPORT==== 23-Jan-2009::11:59:43 ===
myhandler: UUID "4f77b818-e945-11dd-a442-9fe384e7e5a2", event "CHANNEL_HANGUP"

You can answer the call, execute applications, hang up, etc. just as you would in an XML Dialplan. You can also send commands to FreeSWITCH, just as with inbound mode.

Spawn a dynamic Erlang process to handle the call

If you wanted to send events to a dynamic process instead of a registered one, you can instead do:

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<!-- ... -->
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:launch mynode@myserver"/>
<!-- ... -->
</include>

This will make a remote procedure call (RPC) to myhandler:launch with a single argument, a unique reference. The function is expected to return a tuple of the form {Ref, NewPid} where

NewPid should be a spawned process, a newly launched gen_server, etc.

Ref is the original reference passed in.

<conf_dir>/dialplan/default/123456_erlang.xml

<include>
<!-- ... -->
<action application="erlang" data="myhandler:! mynode@server"/>
<!-- ... -->
</include>

If the string after the : is a '!', then mod_erlang_event knows you want to send a new process request to the registered process 'myhandler' which will return a pid that all events for that call will be sent to. The message the registered process receives is of the form:

{get_pid, UUID, Ref, Pid}

Where Ref is a unique reference used to identify this request, UUID is the call's UUID and Pid is the process to send the response to. The expected response is of the form:

{Ref, NewPid}

Where Ref is the original reference passed with get_pid and NewPid is the pid you'd like FreeSWITCH™ to send the events to.14877


The old new_pid message, which didn't include the call's UUID is deprecated in favor of get_pid as of SVN revision 14877 (09/15/09)


The module also supports true spawn/4 behaviour, but it turned out not to be so useful, so the rpc:call functionality above replaced it.

The myhandler example above supports all 3 outbound methods.

API

Messages (get_pid, etc)

Commands

The api is very similar to the one in mod_event_socket, just expressed in Erlang terms. You can send any of these terms by using the ! operator as above.

api

Send a FreeSWITCH API command, a blocking call.

Usage:

{api, <command>, <arguments>}

The 3rd element of the tuple (i.e., <arguments>) is currently mandatory.

Examples

Examples

{api, strftime, "%Y"}
{api, status, ""}
{api, originate, "sofia/mydomain.com/ext@yourvsp.com 1000"}

The result of the API call is sent as a message to the process that sent the message. The format of the reply is a tuple of the form {ok|error, "some reply"}, as seen above.

bgapi

Same as the api command, but is non-blocking. The sending process gets 2 messages, the message indicating the event was accepted, and then sometime later the actual result of the api command. See the example in "6.1.3.2. bgapi command" section.

filter

Specify event types to listen for.

Before using filter , register the process as an event handler with register_event_handler , otherwise it will not receive any events.

This is not a "filter out" but rather a "filter in"; that is, when a filter is applied only the filtered values are received. Multiple filters on a socket connection are allowed.

Usage:

{filter, '[add|delete] <EventHeader1> <ValueToFilter>'[, '[add|delete] <EventHeader2> <ValueToFilter>']}

Where ValueToFilter has the following syntax:

[+|-][character_expression]

or

/regex_expression/

If the symbol "+" is used then events containing header will be sent. If the symbol "-" is used then events will be sent excluding events containing the header.

If the expression is "+value" then events with header = value will be sent. If the expression is "-value" then events will be sent excluding events containing header with that value.

If symbols "+" or "-" have been omitted, then symbol "+" is assumed.

Examples

The following example will subscribe to all events, and then create two filters: one to listen for HEARTBEATS and one to listen for CHANNEL_EXECUTE events.

TODO The example does nothing what is described in the above sentence.

TODO What is the difference between filter and event ?

Examples

[user@localhost ~]# erl  -sname foo@localhost -setcookie ClueCon
Erlang/OTP 17 [erts-6.2.1] [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
Eshell V6.2.1 (abort with ^G)
(foo@localhost)1> {foo, 'freeswitch@localhost'} ! register_event_handler.
register_event_handler
(foo@localhost)2> flush().
Shell got ok
ok
(foo@localhost)3> {foo, 'freeswitch@localhost'} ! {filter, 'CC-Action agent-offering', 'CC-Queue support@default'}.
{filter,'CC-Action agent-offering',
'CC-Queue support@default'}
(foo@localhost)4> flush().
Shell got {filter_command_processing_log,
[{"added","CC-Action","agent-offering"},
{"added","CC-Queue","support@localhost"}]}
ok
(foo@localhost)5> {foo, 'freeswitch@localhost'} ! {event, 'CUSTOM', 'callcenter::info'}.
{event,'CUSTOM','callcenter::info'}
(foo@localhost)6> flush().
Shell got ok
ok
(foo@localhost)7>

register_event_handler

Send the atom register_event_handler to register the process that sent this as the process to receive all subscribed events. You need to use the event command to indicate what events to receive, none are subscribed by default. If you send this command again, the new sending process becomes the one the events are sent to.

Usage:

{irrelevant_atom, freeswitch@your_host} ! register_event_handler.

An Erlang node needs to send register_event_handler as the very first step to register the current process as an event handler (regardless whether inbound and outbound), otherwise no events will be received from the FreeSWITCH C node.

Events are received in the form:

TODO Document this in 5. Message formats.

{event, [(UniqueID|'undefined'),
{EventHeaderKey, EventHeaderValue},
{EventHeaderKey2, EventHeaderValue2},
...]}

The event tuple consists of

  • the atom event,
  • followed by a variable length list of {Key, Value} tuples.

The list's first value is

  • either a call's UUID (represented above as UniqueID)
  • or the atom undefined if the event doesn't relate to a call.

The notion is to make it easier to pattern match for the purpose of the event, without traversing the entire list.

event

Subscribe to an event. See mod_event_socket for more.

Before using event , register the process as an event handler with register_event_handler , otherwise it will not receive any events.

Usage:

TODO What is the exact syntax?

Examples

Examples

{event, 'ALL'}
{event, 'CUSTOM', 'conference::maintenance'}
{event, 'CHANNEL_CREATE', 'CHANNEL_DESTROY', 'CUSTOM', 'conference::maintenance', 'sofia::register', 'sofia::expire'}

Erlang atoms beginning with uppercase letters or containing colons need to be quoted in single quotes.

nixevent

Same syntax as event. Does the inverse.

noevents

Just send the atom noevents to disable all events.

register_log_handler

Send the atom register_log_handler to make the current process the one to send log messages to. Logs are received in the format:

{log, [{level, LogLevel},
{text_channel, TextChannel},
{file, FileName},
{func, FunctionName},
{line, LineNumber},
{data, "Log message"}]}

Logs at DEBUG level by default.

Sending this command again changes the process log messages are sent to to the sending process.

set_log_level

Change the log level. Valid levels are defined switch_types.h. Example:

{set_log_level, info}
{set_log_level, error}

nolog

Send nolog to disable logging.

exit

Send exit to close the connection.

sendevent

{sendevent, 'NOTIFY', [{"profile", "internal"}, {"event-string","check-sync;reboot=false"}, {"user", "false"},
{"host", "192.168.10.4"}, {"content-type", "application/simple-message-summary"}]}

sendmsg

Syntax

{sendmsg, UUID, SendmsgCommandHeaders}

where

  • UUID is either a binary or a string,
  • SendmsgCommandHeaders is a list of key/value tuples specifying sendmsg commands (see section 3.9 sendmsg in mod_event_socket ).

Example

{sendmsg, "d9189508-7caf-dd11-829b-000f1f68e553", [{"call-command", "hangup"}, {"hangup-cause", "16"}]}

For more examples, see section freeswitch_msg.erl in IVR using mod_erlang_event page.

getpid

Isn't this get_pid?

In the Message formats section above the list grepped from source shows get_pid . So which one is correct?

Send getpid to receive {ok,Pid} where Pid is the fake Erlang process ID on the FreeSWITCH side. This is helpful if you want to link to the process so that, for example, FreeSWITCH can notice that your log handler process exited.

handlecall

{handlecall, "129d1446-0063-122c-15aa-001a923f6a0f", mycallhandler}
{handlecall, "129d1446-0063-122c-15aa-001a923f6a0f"}

When using inbound mode, you can send the handlecall tuple to attach a handler to a call (specified by UUID) to process it outbound-style. The format of sent event messages are the same as using outbound mode.

Syntax
  • 3-tuple version: mycallhandler is the name of a registered process that will receive all events related to that call from FreeSWITCH.
  • 2-tuple version: If the name of the registered process is omitted (i.e., only {handlecall, UUID} is sent), the call's events will be sent to the process that sent the message to the FreeSWITCH C-node.

In either case, UUID can be a binary or a string.

Use cases

A call is originated from FreeSWITCH using inbound mode but you want to handle it in a specific way.

XML search bindings

This module also supports mod_xml_curl style bindings to allow FreeSWITCH™ to fetch configuration/directory/dialplan/etc from Erlang. However, unlike mod_xml_curl (and the other modules with this functionality), the bindings are dynamic and not statically configured.

bind

To register the current process, send a {bind, <BindType>} message to mod_erlang_event, where BindType is an atom of one of the binding types supported (see the mod_xml_curl documentation for these).

The binding is automatically removed when the process or the entire node exits or disconnects.

Multiple bindings for one section type are supported as of SVN r16697, the first one to respond wins.

After a successful binding, you will receive messages of the following type:

{fetch, <Section>, <Tag>, <Key>, <Value>, <FetchID>, <Params>} 

where

  • <Section> is an atom describing the binding type (where <Tag> and <Key> are additional parameters; see mod_xml_curl)
    TODO What Erlang terms are accepted if <Tag> and/or <Key> has no value? Empty string?
  • <FetchID> is a UUID associated with the fetch request, and
  • <Params> is a list of key/value tuples with the parameters for this request.

fetch_reply

To tell the switch to take some action, send back a reply of the format:

{fetch_reply, <FetchID>, <XML>} 

where

  • <FetchID> is the ID you received in a fetch message, and
  • <XML> is the XML reply you want to send.

<FetchID> and <XML> can be binaries or strings.

Console Commands

There are only 2 right now:

erlang listeners - list all nodes connected and how many outbound sessions each has
erlang sessions <nodename> - lists all the outbound sessions for the specified node

Feel free to suggest any others that might be useful.

Debugging

If you wish to see all the Erlang terms sent and received from the module, then

  1. add #define EI_DEBUG to src/include/switch_am_config.h and
  2. do a make clean; make; make install in the mod_erlang_event directory.

Now every Erlang message will be printed at DEBUG level to the logfile, and to the console if you enable debug messages at the console.

freeswitch.erl

In the mod_erlang_event source directory, there's an Erlang file called freeswitch.erl. It's a a module to ease dealing with the above API. The module is fairly well documented, and exposes most of the API documented here. It will do all the low level send/recv stuff for you, so you can do stuff like:

 (test@example)3> freeswitch:api(freeswitch@example,status).

And the return value of that function call will be the result of the api command. The module also makes it easy to do bgapi commands effectively, as well as set up XML search bindings, event listeners and log handlers.

Comments:

Probably it is worth to add a reference to Erlang library here: https://github.com/jamhed/fswitch Posted by jamhed at Aug 21, 2017 17:53